<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/MU" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using RADIUS to Support Multiple Untrusted Domains For Web Publishing</title>
	<link>http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/2008/06/18/using-radius-to-support-multiple-untrusted-domains-for-web-publishing/</link>
	<description>Written by Dr Thomas W Shinder, consultant to Microsoft, HP and many Fortune 500 companies on ISA firewall and Web proxy deployments this blog is where administrators get information about ISA Server Universal Threat Management firewalls. Topics include how to manage, deploy, and troubleshoot ISA Server as a network firewall, Web proxy/Web cache, remote access VPN server and VPN gateway to provide a high level of network security for all corporate computers.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: tshinder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/2008/06/18/using-radius-to-support-multiple-untrusted-domains-for-web-publishing/#comment-189748</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/2008/06/18/using-radius-to-support-multiple-untrusted-domains-for-web-publishing/#comment-189748</guid>
					<description>Hi Jason,

True enough! I should test it too. I've already got everything set up for RADIUS, so setting up for LDAP should be pretty easy.

Thanks!
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>True enough! I should test it too. I&#8217;ve already got everything set up for RADIUS, so setting up for LDAP should be pretty easy.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Tom
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/2008/06/18/using-radius-to-support-multiple-untrusted-domains-for-web-publishing/#comment-189746</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/2008/06/18/using-radius-to-support-multiple-untrusted-domains-for-web-publishing/#comment-189746</guid>
					<description>Ok fair enough...

Something I need to test then, as I like to use LDAP/S for &quot;difficult&quot; customers who refuse to domain join ISA :)

Cheers

JJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok fair enough&#8230;</p>
<p>Something I need to test then, as I like to use LDAP/S for &#8220;difficult&#8221; customers who refuse to domain join ISA <img src='http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>JJ
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tshinder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/2008/06/18/using-radius-to-support-multiple-untrusted-domains-for-web-publishing/#comment-189727</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/2008/06/18/using-radius-to-support-multiple-untrusted-domains-for-web-publishing/#comment-189727</guid>
					<description>Hi Jason,

Excellent question. I should have mentioned LDAP and why I choose not to go with it yet. The reason why I choose not to use LDAP is that the DC in the Exchange Server forest is Windows Server 2008. I haven't had a chance to test ISA 2006 LDAP with Windows Server 2008. Since RADIUS is a well established standard, and the LDAP implementation used by ISA to connect to a DC isn't quite as standard (and thus more subject to change), I decided to go the safe way and use RADIUS.

However, there's a good chance that LDAP would work. I just took the cowards way out in this instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>Excellent question. I should have mentioned LDAP and why I choose not to go with it yet. The reason why I choose not to use LDAP is that the DC in the Exchange Server forest is Windows Server 2008. I haven&#8217;t had a chance to test ISA 2006 LDAP with Windows Server 2008. Since RADIUS is a well established standard, and the LDAP implementation used by ISA to connect to a DC isn&#8217;t quite as standard (and thus more subject to change), I decided to go the safe way and use RADIUS.</p>
<p>However, there&#8217;s a good chance that LDAP would work. I just took the cowards way out in this instance.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/2008/06/18/using-radius-to-support-multiple-untrusted-domains-for-web-publishing/#comment-189716</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/2008/06/18/using-radius-to-support-multiple-untrusted-domains-for-web-publishing/#comment-189716</guid>
					<description>Hi Tom,

Why RADIUS and not LDAP?

Cheers

JJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>Why RADIUS and not LDAP?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>JJ
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
